RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02877
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His military records be corrected to include his Air Force
Reserve time.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He joined the Navy Reserves in 2005 and switched to the Air
Force Reserves in 2006 and then back to the Navy Reserves in
2006.
In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of a
Department of the Navy Academic Transcript, dated 27 Jul 13, a
copy of DD Form 4, Enlistment / Reenlistment Document Armed
Forces of the United States, dated 13 Jul 05, a copy of DD Form
2384-1, Notice of Basic Eligibility (NOBE), dated 15 Oct 05, and
a Certificate of Training, dated 6 Jun 06.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant initially entered the Air Force Reserve on 13 Jul
05 for a period of 6 years beginning in the pay grade of E-5.
On 24 Oct 06, Reserve Order A-033 discharged the applicant from
the Air Force Reserves as of 16 Oct 06. His service was
characterized as Honorable.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPTS recommends disapproval. In accordance with DoDI
1215.7, Service Credit for Non-Regular Retirement, Enclosure 2,
paragraph 4.e., Secretaries of the Military Departments provide
for the automated transfer of completed data and credit
information between the components of their respective Service
and, as required, to any other Military Service in the case of
inter-Service transfer.
The applicant is under the jurisdiction of the United States
Navy, as they have possession of his records to include any
counterpart Service participation credit. Pers-912 and ARPC
Point Branch routinely exchange participation information to
comply with DoDI 1215.7; therefore, they recommend the applicant
work directly with the Navy to correct his records.
A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 30 Jan 15 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has not exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-02877 in Executive Session on 2 Jun 15 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-02877 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Sep 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, ARPC/DPTS, dated 25 Nov 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Jan 15.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05162
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05162 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of entry into the Air National Guard be corrected from 13 May 2014, to 14 May 2014 to reflect a one day break in service. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to a miscommunication between the Air National Guard and the recruiting office, his records were entered in error. We took notice of the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02819
In addition, the applicant did not perform the duty in RYE 3 Nov 09, he performed it in RYE Nov 08. To receive the participation credit he requests he would have been required to perform the duty between 4 Nov 08 and 3 Nov 09. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02819 in Executive Session on 3 Apr 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02187
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02187 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, with a period of service ending 30 Sep 05, be corrected to include active duty time served from 21 Sep 90 to 3 Jul 91. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04510
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04510 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Retention/Retirement Year Ending (RYE) in 2002 be credited with additional retirement points to reflect a satisfactory year toward retirement. STATEMENT OF FACTS: During the RYE 11 Jun 02, the applicant was credited with five active duty points, 24 Inactive Duty Training (IDT) points, 15 membership points,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02478
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of her medical retirement, she requested to stay on active duty long enough to complete her final satisfactory service year for a reserve retirement; however, her request was denied. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial due to the applicant not completing sufficient participation points required by law to qualify for retirement. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05148
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05148 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter with attachments prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is insufficient evidence of an error or an...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02511
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02511 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation date be changed to August 2006 and her grade to be corrected to airman first class (E-3). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03024
The applicant provided a copy of the certificate awarding him the MSM first OLC for his outstanding service for the period 15 Feb 10 through 27 Feb 14. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02469
A review of the applicants military personnel records and the documentation provide failed to substantiate the applicants entitlement to award of the AFRMSM. The complete DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 29 Sep 14, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00847
The applicants request is prohibited by Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1215.07, Service Credit for Non-Regular Retirement, due to retirement point credit limitations. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not...